The case involving Congress MLA Nirmala Sapre from the Bina constituency in Sagar district is scheduled for hearing in the High Court on April 29. Ahead of the hearing, Sapre appears to have gained a significant legal advantage that she may use in her defence. According to legal experts, Sapre can argue that she still remains a Congress MLA and has not joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). This situation has emerged due to a recent move by the Congress itself, which could potentially weaken the party’s case—particularly that of Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar. Read the report… Congress Issues Whip, Includes Sapre On April 27, the Congress issued a three-line whip to its Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) for a special session of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. The whip was also sent via email to Nirmala Sapre. The directive instructed party legislators to vote in favour of the resolution on the Women’s Reservation Act (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam). Sources said the whip had two objectives: No voting on amendments; opposition walks out Before the resolution, the opposition demanded discussion on its private member resolution seeking immediate implementation of women’s reservation. The ruling side rejected the demand on procedural grounds. Following an eight-hour debate on the government’s resolution, opposition members moved amendments. Congress MLA and Chief Whip Sohan Valmik demanded voting on these amendments, which was supported by Umang Singhar. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya opposed the demand but said the Speaker’s decision would be respected. Several ruling party leaders stated that amendments to the Chief Minister’s resolution could not be put to vote. The Speaker ruled that since the main resolution had been introduced first, amendments could not be voted upon. In protest, Congress MLAs staged a walkout. Whip may strengthen Sapre’s legal position Experts believe the whip issued to Sapre could become a strong legal argument in her favour. It suggests that the Congress continues to treat her as its MLA, weakening allegations of defection. Additionally, the party has not yet produced concrete evidence proving that Sapre has joined the BJP. Earlier hearing and Evidence dispute During the March 31 hearing, Sapre stated before the court that she remains with the Congress, and her statement was recorded. The court asked Umang Singhar to provide solid proof of her alleged defection to the BJP. His side submitted social media posts and photographs, but the court found them insufficient and sought more credible evidence by April 9. Singhar later indicated that copies of the whip would be submitted as evidence. Speaker–Singhar meeting lasted two hours On April 22, Sapre was scheduled to appear before the Assembly Speaker but did not attend; her representative appeared instead. During this time, the Speaker and Umang Singhar held a two-hour meeting. Singhar pressed for action on defection allegations, claiming he had sufficient evidence. He also alleged that the government was trying to avoid a by-election. Post navigation Heatstroke dehydration cases rise up 20-25% in Indore:Temperature remains above 40°C; children and elderly are most affected ‘He will respond publicly’, says Dhirendra Shastri:Accepts challenge involving identification test and closed-room object recognition