Justice Yashwant Varma’s petition to quash an inquiry report regarding the discovery of money at his residence faces significant hurdles in the Supreme Court. With over 100 MPs seeking his removal, the petition’s maintainability is questioned, especially given the evidence and his delayed response. A PIL further complicates matters, suggesting potential corruption and demanding a police FIR. Post navigation SC: Bail seekers must disclose criminal priors HC: Court can’t take cognisance of PMLA case without hearing accused
