The Supreme Court has observed that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, requiring 11 documents, is more voter-friendly than the previous summary revision’s seven. Despite arguments against excluding Aadhaar, the court highlighted the inclusionary nature of the extensive document list. Petitioners, however, argued that the documents have limited coverage among the population, citing low passport ownership. Post navigation National animal status for cow? What Centre told Parliament BJP digs up 1980 poll roll with Sonia’s name; claims she became Indian in 1983
